Administrative Law’s Racial Blind Spot: Daniel E. Ho

Race and Regulation

31-08-2022 • 22 min

Administrative law has a racial blind spot, argues Daniel E. Hoof Stanford Law School. Judges have long set aside agency actions when government officials have failed to consider the differential impacts of their policy decisions on subgroups of business owners, park visitors, and even animals — but not when they have failed to consider differential impacts based on race or ethnicity. In this episode, Professor Ho traces how civil rights and administrative law have diverged over the past fifty years, as U.S. court decisions have removed issues of racial discrimination from administrative law’s purview. He concludes by discussing reforms that could better address racial inequities in the administrative state.

Race and Regulationfocuses on the most fundamental responsibility of any society: ensuring equal justice, and dignity and respect, to all people.  The host is Cary Coglianese, the Director of the Penn Program on Regulation and a professor at the University of Pennsylvania Law School.

Send comments or questions to podcast@pennreg.org.


Você pode gostar

A Voz do Brasil
A Voz do Brasil
Rádio Senado
Julgados e Comentados
Julgados e Comentados
Ministério Público do Paraná
STF Oficial
STF Oficial
STF - Supremo Tribunal Federal
The 4orce
The 4orce
Defense Media Activity - Proper
aflawinthelaw
aflawinthelaw
Joseph Park
Political Chaos
Political Chaos
Kate Molzahn
The BobCast MOV
The BobCast MOV
Bob Mercer, Tee West, and Rick Sawyer
Right of Passage
Right of Passage
Josh, Jon and Paul
Conté Expert Series
Conté Expert Series
Conté Communications
Criminal Justice Inspection Unpacked
Criminal Justice Inspection Unpacked
Criminal Justice Inspection Northern Ireland
That's So Auburn!
That's So Auburn!
City of Auburn
Sobra Decirlo
Sobra Decirlo
John Valdés